Wednesday, October 31, 2012

30-year mortgage rate edges up

The average interest rate recorded on a conventional 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage rose 2 basis points to 3.76% in September, the Federal Housing Finance Agency said Tuesday.

Meanwhile the adjustable-rate mortgage hit 3.56% while the contract rate for the composite of all fixed and adjustable-rate mortgage loans fell 1 basis point to 3.55% in September compared to 3.56% in August.

 
Initial loan fees and charges made up 0.95% of the average loan balance in September, a 12-basis point drop from August.

Of the purchase-money mortgage loans originated last month, 22% were classified as no-point mortgages, an 8% increase from August.

The average loan term hit 27.4 years in September, a slight increase from August. 


The average loan-to-price ratio also fell 0.2% to 75.6% from 75.8%.


The average loan amount in September hit $254,600, compared to $256,900 in August.

kpanchuk@housingwire.com



The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the authors and those providing comments or external internet links are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of First Capital, we make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, current, suitability, or validity of this information and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Any information provided does not constitute an offer or a solicitation to lend. Providing information to purchase does not guarantee a loan approval. All registered trademarks, copyright, images, or other items used are property of their respective owner and are used for editorial purposes only.
First Capital Mortgage is a subsidiary of PHH Home Loans LLC, a direct lender, Dept. of Corporations file #413-0713 NMLS#4256

Visit FirstCapital Online or call: 310-458-0010

Monday, October 29, 2012

Report: Housing ‘spooked’ by low supply

OC Register
The latest Orange County home inventory report from Steve Thomas and ReportsOnHousing.com — data as of October 25 includes these thoughts …
With homes appreciating again, inventories much lower, and demand much higher, there is nothing to worry about, right? Wrong. The number one spooky feature of today’s market is the absurdly low inventory. Everybody has heard that inventories are low, but the depth of those lows is only understood by active buyers and sellers today. There are only 4,043 homes on the market after shedding an additional 4% in the past two weeks. The most recent prior record low inventory was established in March 2005, with 4,912 homes. That is 21% more than today!
Thomas’ signature housing measurement is his “market time” benchmark. It tracks how many months it theoretically takes to sell all the inventory in the local MLS for-sale listings at the current pace of pending deals being made. By this Thomas logic, as of October 25 — we see …
  • Market time of 1.29 months for Orange County buyers to gobble up all homes for sale at the current pace vs. 1.29 months two weeks ago vs. 3.46 months a year ago vs. 4.28 months two years ago.
  • Of the 8 Orange County pricing slices Thomas tracks, 4 had faster market time vs. 2 weeks ago; and 8 improved over a year ago.
  • Orange County homes listed for under a million bucks have a market time of 0.99 months vs. 4.41 months for homes listed for more than $1 million.
  • So, basically, it is 4.5 times harder to sell a million-dollar-plus residence!
  • And just so you know, the million-dollar market represents 31% of all homes listed and 9% of all homes that entered into escrow in the past 30 days.
Here’s the recent data for listings; deals pending; market time in months; latest vs. 2 weeks earllier, a year ago and 2 years ago. Color coding for market time is red (slowed by 5%-plus in year); green (sped up by 5%-plus in year); and yellow (in between!) Note: k=thousand; m=million … October 29th, 2012,  by 

Slice Listings Deals Market Time (months) 2 week ago 1 yr. ago 2 yr. ago
$0-$250k 470 532 0.88 0.84 2.71 3.06
$250k-$500k 970 1,394 0.70 0.72 2.49 3.39
$500k-$750k 846 690 1.23 1.18 4.12 4.49
$750k-$1m 553 266 2.08 2.16 5.89 6.11
$1m-$1.5m 397 153 2.59 3.01 6.31 6.82
$1.5m-$2m 261 71 3.68 4.66 9.18 16.67
$2m-4m 352 45 7.82 6.78 17.96 16.47
$4m+ 233 13 17.92 12.05 47.33 81.75
All O.C. 4,043 3,145 1.29 1.29 3.46 4.28



The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the authors and those providing comments or external internet links are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of First Capital, we make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, current, suitability, or validity of this information and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Any information provided does not constitute an offer or a solicitation to lend. Providing information to purchase does not guarantee a loan approval. All registered trademarks, copyright, images, or other items used are property of their respective owner and are used for editorial purposes only.
First Capital Mortgage is a subsidiary of PHH Home Loans LLC, a direct lender, Dept. of Corporations file #413-0713 NMLS#4256

Visit First Capital Online or call: 310-458-0010

Analyst: Rising rent a boost for homebuying



Third-quarter reports shows rents are rising throughout the nation.
And not just in the major job centers like San Jose, San Francisco, and Denver — but also in smaller attractive metros like Boulder, Colo., Durham, N.C., and Jacksonville Fla.Apartment owners are enjoying the economic recovery — and their bid to cash in, raising rents, may be a plus for the ownership segment of housing.
But what about California?
According to RealFacts, Orange County rents for all asset classes averaged $1,628, which made it the fifth most expensive apartment market in California following San Jose ($1,980), San Francisco ($1,858), Los Angeles ($1,757), and Santa Cruz ($1,664). Rents rose annually by 10.5% in San Jose, 9.5% in San Francisco, and 4.7% in Orange County.
Apartment rents becoming expensive is creating a significant gap between the rents consumers are expecting and reality.
According to a recent survey by Apartments.com, people searching for apartments have unrealistically low rent expectations, particularly in many of the “hip” cities that young adults seem to like. In Brooklyn, for example, consumer expectations are 50% below actual rents; in Los Angeles 36%; and in San Francisco 35%.
Sounds like especially young adults might be experiencing sticker shock. But what does it all mean?
It is a good economic sign that the apartment market is still going strong. That may benefit the housing market in the years ahead.
The financial competitiveness of apartment living has been sheltered until recently by low price-gain expectations for ownership housing. But this has changed recently, which is increasing the attractiveness of owning a home for many consumers.
Finally, especially young adults — those echo boomers in search of an active urban lifestyle -– may be somewhat surprised by expensive and rising rents as they enter the market. As they search for a place to live, they are likely to develop more realistic rent expectations — and turn a more favorable eye to homeownership.
Chart below compares third-quarter RealFacts data for major California markets — and recent job growth:
Metros
Q3 asking rent
Annual rent growth
Q3 vacancy rate
Annual job growth 9/12
San Jose
$1,980
10.5%
4.7%
2.5%
San Francisco-Oakland
$1,858
9.5%
3.9%
3.1%
Los Angeles
$1,757
4.7%
4.8%
1.6%
Santa Cruz
$1,664
3.0%
4.0%
2.9%
Orange County
$1,628
4.7%
5.4%
1.7%
Ventura County
$1,456
3.7%
4.2%
0.5%
San Diego County
$1,456
3.8%
4.9%
2.1%
Inland Empire
$1,107
1.7%
6.3%
1.4%
Sacramento
$963
0.9%
5.9%
2.0%
Bakersfield
$913
7.4%
2.7%
1.6%



The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the authors and those providing comments or external internet links are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of First Capital, we make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, current, suitability, or validity of this information and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. Any information provided does not constitute an offer or a solicitation to lend. Providing information to purchase does not guarantee a loan approval. All registered trademarks, copyright, images, or other items used are property of their respective owner and are used for editorial purposes only.
First Capital Mortgage is a subsidiary of PHH Home Loans LLC, a direct lender, Dept. of Corporations file #413-0713 NMLS#4256

Visit First Capital Online or call: 310-458-0010