Monday, November 7, 2011

Lobbying Titans Square Off Over Loan Limits.

Influential housing and banking industry lobbying groups are clashing on Capitol Hill over whether to restore higher limits on the size of government-backed mortgage loans.

The lobbying battle pits real-estate agents against mortgage insurers — and even has banking groups on opposite sides. It comes as House and Senate negotiators prepare in the coming weeks to negotiators the details of a bill to fund several federal agencies through next September.

Senate lawmakers want the final spending bill to include a measure lifting the loan limits, which fell to $625,500 on Oct. 1 in expensive markets such as New York and San Francisco from $729,750. Under the Senate’s version of the bill, the higher limits would be restored until the end of 2013.

Powerful Republican lawmakers in the House favor keeping those limits at their current levels. Other Republicans, however, including several from California and New York, want to raise them.

The debate highlights a key question about whether the main goal of housing policy: Is the best to support the weak sector or at least do no harm to it? Or, should the top priority be reducing the federal government’s footprint in the $10.4 trillion U.S. mortgage market, given that the federal government stands behind more than nine in 10 new loans?

The loan limits vary by location, based on local home prices in a particular area. They have fallen to as low as $271,050 in some areas for loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration, which guarantees loans with down payments as low as 3.5%. Limits for loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can fall to as low as $417,000.

The National Association of Realtors has been the leading group marshalling forces to get the loan limits restored. Its allies include groups representing title agents, credit unions, home builders and mortgage bankers. The Realtors group is a big player on Capitol Hill, having spent $17.6 million on lobbying last year, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Ron Phipps, the trade group’s president and a Realtor from Warwick, R.I., said in an interview Friday that he is hearing from agents around the country who are concerned about the drop in loan limits.

The change, he said, has reduced the amount of money potential home buyers can borrow in nearly 660 counties in 42 states. That has forced home buyers to look for cheaper homes or drop out of the market entirely. The biggest impact on the housing market has been in the lower price ranges, rather than in cities with high housing costs, Mr. Phipps said.

The Realtors have won many battles on Capitol Hill and don’t expect this one to be different. “We look to prevail and we expect to prevail,” Mr. Phipps said. “We are working diligently to relay the message for American home buyers and home owners in a big way.”

Mortgage insurers, however, are pressing to maintain the current limits. Those companies allow borrowers to take out mortgages with down payments of less than 20%. Borrowers pay premiums and the mortgage insurers absorb some of the cost when borrowers default. The industry has lost market share to the FHA after the housing bust, and is struggling with losses from defaults and foreclosures. A large mortgage insurer, PMI Group Inc., was taken over by regulators last month.

The Mortgage Insurance Companies of America, which spent $4.1 million on lobbying last year, argues that restoring the higher loan limits would prevent private investment from returning to the U.S. housing market, a goal of both Democrats and Republicans.

Lifting the loan limits, the group argues, will push borrowers back into FHA-backed loans, with taxpayers holding 100% of the risk. And of course, doing so would hurt mortgage insurers’ ability to compete for business.
“This is a very small rollback,” in loan limits, said Teresa Bryce Bazemore, president of Radian Group Inc.’s mortgage-insurance business and president of the industry trade group. Even after the decline in loan limits, “given the fact that home prices have fallen, most borrowers would still qualify for an FHA loan,” she said.

Banking groups are divided on the loan-limit issue. While the Mortgage Bankers Association favors raising the loan limits, the American Bankers Association is opposed to such a move.
“Higher loan limits have done little to increase demand or prevent home prices from falling,” wrote Floyd Stoner, the American Bankers Association’s top lobbyist, in a letter to lawmakers this week. “Private capital must return to housing finance if we are ever going to reform the system and take the taxpayer off the hook for the guarantee of virtually every mortgage made.”

The views, opinions, positions or strategies expressed by the authors and those providing comments or external internet links are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, positions or strategies of First Capital, we make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, current, suitability, or validity of this information and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All registered trademarks, copyright, images, or other items used are property of their respective owner and are used for editorial purposes only.

Visit First Capital Online or call: 310-458-0010

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.